Raw: [
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) Board of Trustees clarified that “no changes have been […]]
SBTi Clarifies that “No Change Has Been Made” to Use of Carbon Credits in Net Zero Plans Following Backlash – ESG Today
ESG Investing, sustainable finance & business sustainability news
ESG investing news, analysis, research and information
Top Stories ESG News
Companies
Government
Investors
Regulators
Sustainable Finance
ESG Solutions ESG Tools, Services
Companies Companies
Investors Investors
ESG Disclosure ESG Reporting
Analysis
Regulators
Reports, Studies
Newsfeed
Whitepapers
Events
About About us
Our Team
Advertise With Us
Professional bodies
SBTi Clarifies that “No Change Has Been Made” to Use of Carbon Credits in Net Zero Plans Following Backlash
Mark Segal
April 16, 2024
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) Board of Trustees clarified that “no changes have been made to SBTi current standards,” following a sharp internal backlash to its recent announcement of plans to update its standard for corporate net zero target setting by extending the use of environmental attribute certificates (EACs), such as emissions reduction credits, to help address Scope 3 emissions.
The clarification follows reports of letters from SBTi staff responding to the board’s announcement, indicating that staff were “deeply concerned” about the statement, and reportedly calling for the resignation of the CEO and board members.
The SBTi was founded in 2015 with the goal to establish science-based environmental target setting as a standard corporate practice. The organizations’ key functions include defining and promoting best practice in emissions reductions and net-zero targets in line with climate science, providing technical assistance to companies who set science-based targets, and providing companies with independent assessment and validation of their emissions reduction targets.
The organization’s announcement followed the launch of a call for evidence last year regarding the use of energy attribute certificates in its planned update of the SBTi’s Corporate Net Zero Standard, used to assess and certify companies’ decarbonization commitments to achieve net zero emissions and to act as a blueprint for companies’ science-based climate target setting. The initial standard, issued in 2021, did not permit carbon credits for emissions reduction.
In its announcement last week, the SBTi board said that the use of energy attribute certificates under the revised standard would be limited to abatement of Scope 3 emission, adding that the standard would include “specific guardrails and thresholds as well as the rules to be applied for these certificates.”
Scope 3 emissions, which originate in companies’ value chains, including the supply chain or use of products, typically make up the vast majority of most companies’ emissions impact, often accounting for more than 90% of emissions overall, but they are also the most difficult to measure and manage, occurring in areas outside of companies’ direct control.
While the use of offsetting practices to account for emissions that are more challenging to eliminate forms part of most companies’ net zero plans, some companies’ climate pledges are coming under increasing scrutiny for relying too heavily on offsetting schemes rather than on actual emissions reductions. A recent study of high-emitting companies by climate-focused non-profits NewClimate Institute and Carbon Market Watch, for example, found that the companies plan to offset between 23% and 45% of their combined emission footprint, and that the amount of land-use related offsets included in corporate climate strategies would significantly outstrip the global availability of such assets. Additionally, carbon offsetting markets faces a series of challenges, however, with participants often unable to differentiate between high and low quality projects with insufficient or inconsistent data to assess the effectiveness of projects.
In a letter by SBTi staff seen by ESG Today, concerns were raised about the board’s statement, as well as the process behind its development, including claims that the decision undermined the organization’s Standard Operating Procedures, coming “as a decision made by the SBTi rather than a position of the board.” The letter added that “the SBTi’s standards will not change until we have completed the necessary research, consultation, and governance steps — all specified within SBTi procedures,” and expressed “regret that this statement has caused concern, confusion, and damaged the trust of critical stakeholders.” In another letter, not seen by ESG Today, but reported by media outlets including Reuters and The Guardian, staff said that it would work against allowing the SBTi to “become a greenwashing platform,” and called for the resignation of the CEO and board member supporting the new policy.
In its clarification, the SBTi board stated that “any use of EACs for Scope 3 will be informed by evidence,” and that it plans to issue a discussion paper in July about the potential changes, prior to the drafting phase of the updated standard. The board also confirmed that any changes to the standard will be done according to the organization’s Standard Operating Procedure.
In a statement issued following the clarification, environmental organization WWF, one of the founders of the SBTi, while stating that “offsets cannot be a substitute for reducing emissions from company operations, products, and value chains,” also left room for some use of carbon credits, but “limited in its application to address a small percentage of residual emissions,” and backed by “increased accountability and pursued as part of a holistic and scientifically defined reduction pathway.”
The WWF statement added:
“Updated guidance should also address the very real concerns regarding the poor track record of offsets in delivering real emissions reductions and driving market transformation.”
Mark founded ESG Today following a 20 year career in investment management and research. Prior to founding ESG Today, Mark worked at Delaney Capital Management (DCM) in Toronto, Canada, most recently as the firm’s head of U.S. equities. While at DCM, Mark was part of the firm’s ESG team, responsible for evaluating and tracking the sustainability factors impacting portfolio companies, and assessing the suitability of companies for portfolio inclusion. Mark also spent several years in the sell-side research industry, covering the technology and services sectors. Mark holds an MBA from Columbia University in New York, a BBA from the Schulich School of Business at York University in Toronto, and is a CFA charterholder.
Related Posts
Professional bodies /
SBTi to Allow Increased Role for Carbon Credits in Net Zero Targets
Professional bodies /
SBTi Says Number of Companies Setting Validated Climate Targets Doubles in Past Year
Professional bodies /
CFA Institute, PRI, GSIA Issue Harmonized Definitions for Sustainable Investing
‹ KPMG: Majority of U.S. CEOs Expect Significant Returns from Sustainability Investments Within 3-5 Years
ESG Today Newsletter – Subscribe
Subscribe to the ESG Today NewsletterJoin our mailing list for the latest breaking ESG investment news!
LevelC-LevelSVP / EVPDirector / VPManager / SupervisorMid or Entry LevelFreelance / ContractStudent / InternRetiredOther
FunctionAccounting & FinanceBusiness Development & SalesCustomer SupportFacilitiesHR & TalentInvestingLegalMarketing & CommunicationsOperationsR & DProcurement & ContractingSupply Chain & DistributionSustainabilityStrategyTechnologyOther
SUBSCRIBE!
You have Successfully Subscribed!
Sustainable Finance
EdgeConneX Secures $1.9 Billion in Financing Tied to Sustainability Goals
Zero-Emission Truck Startup Windrose Raises $110 Million
Barclays Appoints Rafael Abati as Co-Head of Energy Transition Group in EMEA
West Virginia Bans HSBC, Citi from Banking Contract over ESG Policies
Government
EU Adopts Rules Requiring All New Buildings to Be Zero Emissions by 2030
EU Parliament Adopts Law to Establish Carbon Removal Certification System
West Virginia Bans HSBC, Citi from Banking Contract over ESG Policies
SEC Pauses Climate Disclosure Rules Amidst Legal Challenges
Categories
Select Category
Business Wire
ESG News
Analysis
Climate
Companies
Energy Transition
Environment
ESG Reporting
ESG Tools, Services
Executive Moves
Governance
Government
Guest Posts
Investors
M&A
New funds & products
Platforms & Markets
Private Equity & Venture Capital
Professional bodies
Regulators
Reports, Studies
Social
Social & Governance
Sustainable Finance
Welcome
Back to Top
Home
About us
Disclosure, cookies & privacy policy
© ESG Today 2024
Don’t miss the top ESG stories!Join the ESG Today daily newsletter and get all the top ESG stories, like this one.
Subscribe now below!
LevelC-LevelSVP / EVPDirector / VPManager / SupervisorMid or Entry LevelFreelance / ContractStudent / InternRetiredOther
FunctionAccounting & FinanceBusiness Development & SalesCustomer SupportFacilitiesHR & TalentInvestingLegalMarketing & CommunicationsOperationsProcurement & ContractingR & DStrategySupply Chain & DistributionSustainabilityTechnologyOther
SUBSCRIBE!
You have Successfully Subscribed!
Never miss the latest breaking ESG investment news. Get ESG Today’s newsletter today!
Subscribe Now
c